Spiccia v. Paterson Silk Throwing Co., Inc.1942 N.J. LEXIS 292 N.J.1942Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.
