History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cotton v. Keen
1939 N.J. LEXIS 288
| N.J. | 1939
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.

For reversal — HEHER, J. 1.

Case Details

Case Name: Cotton v. Keen
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 13, 1939
Citation: 1939 N.J. LEXIS 288
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.