History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cotton v. Keen
1939 N.J. LEXIS 288
N.J.
1939
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.

For reversal — HEHER, J. 1.

Case Details

Case Name: Cotton v. Keen
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 13, 1939
Citation: 1939 N.J. LEXIS 288
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.