Cotton v. Keen
1939 N.J. LEXIS 288
N.J.1939Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.
For reversal — HEHER, J. 1.