Cotton v. Keen
1939 N.J. LEXIS 288
| N.J. | 1939|
Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.
For reversal — HEHER, J. 1.
