History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roseville Investment Corp. v. Grudin
168 A. 617
N.J.
1933
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Smith in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 399

Case Details

Case Name: Roseville Investment Corp. v. Grudin
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 27, 1933
Citation: 168 A. 617
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.