History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roseville Investment Corp. v. Grudin
168 A. 617
| N.J. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Smith in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 399

Case Details

Case Name: Roseville Investment Corp. v. Grudin
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 27, 1933
Citation: 168 A. 617
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.