History
  • No items yet
midpage
New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Newark
1940 N.J. LEXIS 289
N.J.
1940
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmanc — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, DONGES, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Newark
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 25, 1940
Citation: 1940 N.J. LEXIS 289
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.