History
  • No items yet
midpage
Winne v. Morrissey
118 N.J.L. 195
| N.J. | 1937
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, except that, it appearing that the stipulated facts relate only to the judgment obtained against the surety company in the Municipal Court of New York City and the costs thereon, and nothing appearing therein touching the payment of attorneys' fees and expenses by the surety company, we express no opinion on this point.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, with costs. *Page 196 For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Winne v. Morrissey
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 30, 1937
Citation: 118 N.J.L. 195
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.