History
  • No items yet
midpage
New Miami Shores Co. v. Duggan
109 N.J.L. 220
| N.J. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

The judgment will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Oliphant.

It may be well to add that the only affirmative defense set up in the answer is payment. The rule seems to be that novation may not be proved under a general denial, nor even under a plea of payment. The defense of novation is an affirmative defense in the nature of release and discharge, and must be pleaded in a similar manner as a basis of proof. 46 Corp. Jur. 624. However, the defense was considered on its merits by the trial judge, and it has been so considered here.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 221

Case Details

Case Name: New Miami Shores Co. v. Duggan
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 16, 1932
Citation: 109 N.J.L. 220
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.