History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stieffel v. Davenport
101 N.J.L. 234
| N.J. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

The appeal is directed at the correctness of the refusal of the trial court to nonsuit and direct a verdict in favor of appellant, and to the alleged error of the court in submitting the cause to the jury upon a theory not supported by the pleadings. The latter ground is not properly before us, because not raised by proper exception or otherwise in the trial court.

There was no error in the trial court's refusal to nonsuit or direct a verdict, because there was evidence requiring a submission of the cause to the jury.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 235

Case Details

Case Name: Stieffel v. Davenport
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 19, 1925
Citation: 101 N.J.L. 234
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.