History
  • No items yet
midpage
Venino v. Naegele
15 Stock. 357
N.J.
1926
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 358

Case Details

Case Name: Venino v. Naegele
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 27, 1926
Citation: 15 Stock. 357
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.