The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 1143.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.