I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.
107 N.J.L. 386
N.J.1931Check TreatmentThe judgment of the Supreme Court, Passaic Circuit, is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Porter in the foregoing opinion.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 389