History
  • No items yet
midpage
I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.
107 N.J.L. 386
| N.J. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

The judgment of the Supreme Court, Passaic Circuit, is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Porter in the foregoing opinion.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 389

Case Details

Case Name: I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 2, 1931
Citation: 107 N.J.L. 386
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.