History
  • No items yet
midpage
I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.
107 N.J.L. 386
N.J.
1931
Check Treatment

The judgment of the Supreme Court, Passaic Circuit, is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Porter in the foregoing opinion.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 389

Case Details

Case Name: I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 2, 1931
Citation: 107 N.J.L. 386
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.