History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
129 N.J. Eq. 100
| N.J. | 1941
|
Check Treatment

The Court of Chancery denied a motion to strike the complainant's bill. We affirmed this denial in Brown v.Fidelity Union Trust Co., 128 N.J. Eq. 197. It also denied a motion to strike a counter-claim filed in behalf of an infant defendant by his guardian ad litem. The appeal from this order is presented in this case. The issues in both matters are precisely the same. It is conceded that in this case we would follow our previous decision. The appellant desires to abandon its appeal, and there would be no objection by the guardian allitem to this course if his costs were paid and a counsel fee. He is not entitled to a counsel fee in this *Page 101 cause. Nobile v. Bartletta, 112 N.J. Eq. 304. The appeal having been taken in good faith before our decision in Brown v.Fidelity Union Trust Co., supra, we do not think costs should be taxed.

The motion that appellant may have leave to abandon its appeal will be granted.

For the allowance of costs — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, HEHER, WOLFSKEIL, HAGUE, JJ. 5.

For the disallowance of costs — CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, RAFFERTY, JJ. 7.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 5, 1941
Citation: 129 N.J. Eq. 100
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.