History
  • No items yet
midpage
Currie v. Mayor of Jersey City
98 N.J. Eq. 689
| N.J. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

Of the five points specifically taken up and decided by the learned vice-chancellor, only two are urged on this appeal. They are, first, that the filing in the county clerk's office of the Currie map (which he properly held to be an unofficial filing), plus the adoption of grades by the city, worked a complete dedication; second, that the deeds made by complainants (in which intent to dedicate was expressly disclaimed) were a confirmation of an original dedicatory intent.

We conclude that the decree should be affirmed, and for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Griffin so far as they deal with the points now argued. As to other points considered by him, but not raised here, we, naturally, express no opinion.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — PARKER, J. 1.

*Page 690

Case Details

Case Name: Currie v. Mayor of Jersey City
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 19, 1925
Citation: 98 N.J. Eq. 689
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.