History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matthews v. Otis Elevator Co.
131 N.J.L. 472
| N.J. | 1944
|
Check Treatment

The judges being equally divided on the question as to whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division which renders any opinion by the court impossible. *Page 473 The judgment under review is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 8.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 8.

Case Details

Case Name: Matthews v. Otis Elevator Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 20, 1944
Citation: 131 N.J.L. 472
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.