History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weiss v. Max
136 N.J. Eq. 100
| N.J. | 1945
|
Check Treatment

The appellant brings this appeal because her bill to impose a trust in her favor was dismissed on grounds stated in the opinion below, and also because of lack of proof to sustain the contentions. A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree should be affirmed.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 101

Case Details

Case Name: Weiss v. Max
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 4, 1945
Citation: 136 N.J. Eq. 100
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.