History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sprague v. Penrose
109 N.J.L. 347
| N.J. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None. *Page 348

Case Details

Case Name: Sprague v. Penrose
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 17, 1932
Citation: 109 N.J.L. 347
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.