History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leonard v. Caccippoli
1927 N.J. LEXIS 215
N.J.
1927
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None. *Page 497

Case Details

Case Name: Leonard v. Caccippoli
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 31, 1927
Citation: 1927 N.J. LEXIS 215
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.