History
  • No items yet
midpage
Muller v. Raskind
103 N.J. Eq. 20
| N.J. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N.J. Eq. 258. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 21

Case Details

Case Name: Muller v. Raskind
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 14, 1928
Citation: 103 N.J. Eq. 20
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.