Wilday v. Panas
122 N.J.L. 28
N.J.1939Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 34