Wilday v. Panas
122 N.J.L. 28
| N.J. | 1939|
Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 34
