History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.
5 A.2d 785
| N.J. | 1939
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 431

Case Details

Case Name: Fischman v. Joseph Fish Hat Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 21, 1939
Citation: 5 A.2d 785
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.