History
  • No items yet
midpage
Coltinuk v. Hockstein
97 N.J. Eq. 371
| N.J. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

The bill of complaint in this case was filed to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real estate, located in the city of Bayonne.

Our reading of the record and a consideration of the briefs lead us to the same conclusion as that of the vice-chancellor. viz., a decree for specific performance should be ordered.

The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, CLARK, McGLENNON, JJ. 8.

For reversal — PARKER, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 6. *Page 372

Case Details

Case Name: Coltinuk v. Hockstein
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 19, 1925
Citation: 97 N.J. Eq. 371
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.