The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court. *Page 252For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, DEAR, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
