History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sudol v. Gurtman
104 N.J.L. 668
| N.J. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Sudol v. Gurtman
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 14, 1928
Citation: 104 N.J.L. 668
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.