Tricolo v. Centalanza
101 N.J.L. 569
N.J.1925Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.