Tricolo v. Centalanza
101 N.J.L. 569
| N.J. | 1925|
Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
