History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tricolo v. Centalanza
101 N.J.L. 569
N.J.
1925
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Tricolo v. Centalanza
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 18, 1925
Citation: 101 N.J.L. 569
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.