History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taormina v. Poline
122 N.J. Eq. 221
| N.J. | 1937
|
Check Treatment

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs, together with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause. We can only conclude that the decree appealed from was proper, and it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

*Page 222

Case Details

Case Name: Taormina v. Poline
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 30, 1937
Citation: 122 N.J. Eq. 221
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.