History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hart v. Seacoast Credit Corp.
116 N.J. Eq. 573
| N.J. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

The decree herein will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

We find it unnecessary to determine that four months' delay in seeking the approval of the board of public utility commissioners of the sale of such franchises would, under any and all circumstances, render the sale void. We express no opinion as to this. Nor is it necessary to review the holding below that "money in court or in the hands of an officer," and "money due on a judgment," are exempt from attachment.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Hart v. Seacoast Credit Corp.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 27, 1934
Citation: 116 N.J. Eq. 573
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.