History
  • No items yet
midpage
Holzman v. Yeungling
1929 N.J. LEXIS 172
N.J.
1929
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, CAMPBELL, CASE, BODINE, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Holzman v. Yeungling
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 14, 1929
Citation: 1929 N.J. LEXIS 172
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.