History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Zeek
121 N.J.L. 584
| N.J. | 1939
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None. *Page 585

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Zeek
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 13, 1939
Citation: 121 N.J.L. 584
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.