State v. Zeek
121 N.J.L. 584
| N.J. | 1939|
Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None. *Page 585
