History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Dunn
1928 N.J. LEXIS 236
| N.J. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dunn
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 6, 1928
Citation: 1928 N.J. LEXIS 236
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.