History
  • No items yet
midpage
Katz v. Zapela
1933 N.J. LEXIS 404
| N.J. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 258.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, BROGAN, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Katz v. Zapela
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 5, 1933
Citation: 1933 N.J. LEXIS 404
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.