History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith
125 N.J. Eq. 482
| N.J. | 1939
|
Check Treatment

We have carefully examined the proofs and the arguments of counsel and the memorandum filed by the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause, and we are of the opinion that his findings of fact and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The order confirming the sale in foreclosure is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 483

Case Details

Case Name: Hackettstown National Bank v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 21, 1939
Citation: 125 N.J. Eq. 482
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.