History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brands v. Cassedy
125 N.J. Eq. 346
| N.J. | 1939
|
Check Treatment

We have carefully examined the pleading and proofs in this case, the arguments of counsel and the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor, and we are of the opinion that his conclusions as to the facts and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 347

Case Details

Case Name: Brands v. Cassedy
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 21, 1939
Citation: 125 N.J. Eq. 346
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.