History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.
100 N.J. Eq. 554
| N.J. | 1927
|
Check Treatment

Vice-Chancellor Berry, who heard this case in the court of chancery, advised a decree dismissing the complainants' bill of complaint.

Our reading of the record leads us to the same conclusion as that of the learned vice-chancellor. We agree with the findings of fact as made by the vice-chancellor. We also agree with his application of the legal principles.

The decree of the court of chancery dismissing the complainants' bill is therefore affirmed and the decree is in all other respects affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 555

Case Details

Case Name: Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 31, 1927
Citation: 100 N.J. Eq. 554
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.