History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rowan v. General Casualty and Surety Co.
1927 N.J. LEXIS 264
N.J.
1927
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Rowan v. General Casualty and Surety Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 16, 1927
Citation: 1927 N.J. LEXIS 264
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.