History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tabor v. Rockingham Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance
69 N.H. 666
| N.H. | 1897
|
Check Treatment

ASSUMPSIT, on a fire insurance policy, to recover for a loss occurring under circumstances during whose existence or continuance the policy provided it should be void and inoperative. As the only grounds upon which the plaintiff sought to avoid the conditions of the policy were oral statements made to him by, an agent of the company, who had only authority to solicit risk, receive applications, deliver policies, and collect premiums, judgment was ordered for the defendants. Heath v. Insurance Co.,58 N.H. 414.

Case Details

Case Name: Tabor v. Rockingham Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1897
Citation: 69 N.H. 666
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.