History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chase v. Corson
32 A. 775
| N.H. | 1893
|
Check Treatment

ASSUMPSIT, for money paid for repairs of a steam boiler which the plaintiffs bought of the defendant. Subject to exception, the plaintiffs were permitted to amend by filing a count for a breach of the defendant's warranty of the boiler. A former owner of the boiler, called by the defendant, testified to its condition, quality, and value when the plaintiffs bought it, to its cost when new, and to the number of years it had been run. On cross-examination he was allowed to testify, subject to the defendant's exception, that he paid $175 for the boiler and some other articles. The exceptions were overruled.

WALLACE, J., did not sit.

Case Details

Case Name: Chase v. Corson
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1893
Citation: 32 A. 775
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.