History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Carpenter
63 N.H. 65
| N.H. | 1884
|
Check Treatment

A bill in equity to set aside the judgments in these cases is not the proper remedy. If, for any reason, the judgments were not properly rendered, the error could have been corrected by a petition for a new trial within the time prescribed in the statute (G. L., c. 234, ss. 1, 2, 4), and it may now be done on a motion to bring the actions forward and vacate the judgments. Upon this motion, such order can be made as justice requires. Bellows v. Stone, 14 N.H. 175; Frink v. Frink, 43 N.H. 508; Hillsborough v. Nichols, 46 N.H. 379; Judge of Probate v. Webster, 46 N.H. 518; Metcalf v. Gilmore, 59 N.H. 417.

Bill dismissed without prejudice.

CARPENTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Carpenter
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1884
Citation: 63 N.H. 65
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.