History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jellison v. Jellison
70 N.H. 633
| N.H. | 1900
|
Check Treatment

The question of whether justice required the granting of the motion is not one of law. As justice required that the order be made, and the court had power to make it (P.S., c. 176, s. 4), it is immaterial whether the application was called a petition or a motion. The parties were already in court, the libelant was given an opportunity to be heard, and if a further hearing is needed it can be had upon application.

Exception overruled.

YOUNG, J., did not sit: CHASE, J., dissented: the others concurred. *Page 634

Case Details

Case Name: Jellison v. Jellison
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1900
Citation: 70 N.H. 633
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.