History
  • No items yet
midpage
Almy Reward Cases
34 A. 745
| N.H. | 1894
|
Check Treatment

PETITIONS, under Laws 1893, c. 94, for the reward offered for the arrest or causing the arrest of Almy. The court found that Whitcher and Brown, and Warden, through information furnished by them, caused Almy's arrest; that none of the other petitioners arrested him or caused his arrest; awarded a part of the reward to Whitcher and Brown and a part to Warden, if it could lawfully be apportioned, otherwise the whole to Whitcher and Brown; and dismissed the other petitions. Each of the parties, including the state, excepted to all the court's findings and orders not favorable to it, him, or her. No ground being stated or appearing on which any of the exceptions could be sustained, they were overruled, and the reward adjudged in part to Whitcher and Brown, and in part to Warden.

SMITH, J., did not sit. *Page 606

Case Details

Case Name: Almy Reward Cases
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1894
Citation: 34 A. 745
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.