History
  • No items yet
midpage
Locke v. Pittsfield
63 N.H. 122
N.H.
1884
Check Treatment

No reason has been or can be given why Edes v. Boardman does not apply to the assessment and collection of taxes for school-district purposes; and therefore, according to the agreement of the parties, the nonsuits ordered at the trial term must stand.

Exceptions overruled.

SMITH J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Locke v. Pittsfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1884
Citation: 63 N.H. 122
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.