History
  • No items yet
midpage
Locke v. Pittsfield
63 N.H. 122
| N.H. | 1884
|
Check Treatment

No reason has been or can be given why Edes v. Boardman does not apply to the assessment and collection of taxes for school-district purposes; and therefore, according to the agreement of the parties, the nonsuits ordered at the trial term must stand.

Exceptions overruled.

SMITH J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Locke v. Pittsfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1884
Citation: 63 N.H. 122
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.