History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Ingalls
59 N.H. 88
| N.H. | 1879
|
Check Treatment

The offence charged was one for which the penalty was not death, nor imprisonment for more than one year, and might be charged by information. G. L., c. 260, ss. 1, 10; State v. Dover, 9 N.H. 468. In the absence of the attorney-general, the solicitor was the proper officer to sign and present the information. G. L., c. 16, s. 5. The offence charged was continuing in its nature, and might be alleged with a continuando. 1 Bish. Cr. Pr. 392, 397; Bish. St. Of. 722; Hinson v. The State, 7 Mo. 244. A day certain, within the time limited by law for the recovery of a penalty, and prior to the filing of the information, must be stated. State v. Pratt, 14 N.H. 456; State v. Caverly, 51 N.H. 446; Com. v. Doyle, 110 Mass. 103; State v. Davidson, 36 Tex. 325; 1 Arch. Cr. Pl. 257;. 2 Hawk. P. C., c. 25, s. 77. The averment of time in the information was of a day certain. If that day was prior to the filing of the information, it was sufficient.

Case discharged.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ingalls
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1879
Citation: 59 N.H. 88
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.