History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robbins v. Ducey A.
27 A.2d 106
| N.H. | 1942
|
Check Treatment

Although the property was taxed to the remainderman, as between her and the plaintiff it was the latter's obligation to pay the taxes, in the absence of an agreement by the remainderman to pay them. Bodwell v. Nutter,63 N.H. 446, 448; Reeves v. Huckins, 80 N.H. 348, 350. It would be inequitable for the plaintiff to acquire the remainderman's title through failure to discharge his obligations to her. In bidding in the property he paid for a lien which it was his duty to discharge, and he thus paid a tax which he ought to pay. Woodbury v. Swan, 59 N.H. 22; Saunders v. Farmer,62 N.H. 572; Barker v. Jones, 62 N.H. 497; Laton v. Balcom 64 N.H. 92, 94.

Case discharged. *Page 183

Case Details

Case Name: Robbins v. Ducey A.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 24, 1942
Citation: 27 A.2d 106
Docket Number: No. 3334.
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.