History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Loughlin
20 A. 981
| N.H. | 1890
|
Check Treatment

It is a general principle, that whenever documents or books of a public nature would of themselves be evidence if produced, their contents may be proved by immediate copies, duly verified (Forsaith v. Clark, 21 N.H. 409,419); and when the proof may be by a copy, an examined copy, duly made and sworn to by any competent witness, or a copy certified by the officer having legal custody of the book or document, is alike admissible. Whitehouse v. Bickford, 29 N.H. 471; State v. Lynde, 77 Me. 561; 1 Gr. Ev., s. 485; Best Ev. (Morgan's ed.) ss. 485, 486; 1 Stark. Ev. (3d ed.) 226; Abb. Tr. Ev. 50.

No objection appearing to the competency of Chase as a witness the copy of the record made and sworn to by him was properly admitted.

Exceptions overruled.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 267

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Loughlin
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1890
Citation: 20 A. 981
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.