History
  • No items yet
midpage
Seaver v. Manchester Street Railway
78 N.H. 584
| N.H. | 1916
|
Check Treatment

The defendant claims that verdicts should have been directed because upon one construction of Mrs. Seaver's testimony it could have been found that the steps were "all right." But another and equally legitimate interpretation of her testimony leads to the conclusion that the steps were icy, slippery and dangerous.

Exception overruled.

All concurred. *Page 585

Case Details

Case Name: Seaver v. Manchester Street Railway
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Feb 1, 1916
Citation: 78 N.H. 584
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.