History
  • No items yet
midpage
Whittredge v. Edmunds
63 N.H. 248
| N.H. | 1884
|
Check Treatment

The finding of no fraud in the execution of the note and mortgage necessarily included the finding that the transaction was in good faith, and that the making of the note and mortgage to secure a larger sum than was actually due was an unintentional error and innocent mistake. Noyes v. Patrick, 58 N.H. 618. The mortgage being made in good faith, though describing the debt secured as larger than that actually existing at the time, cannot, in the absence of fraud, be defeated by the mortgagor's creditors by reason of an innocent mistake. Putnam v. Osgood, 52 N.H. 148,158; Gordon v. Preston, 1 Watts (Penn.) 385; Jones Mort., s. 348.

Exceptions overruled.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Whittredge v. Edmunds
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1884
Citation: 63 N.H. 248
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.