History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moskwa v. Nassikas
133 A. 321
| N.H. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

There can be no recovery for the purchase price of goods which the vendor could not legally sell. Albertson v. Shenton, 78 N.H. 216; Dunbar v. Locke,62 N.H. 442; Bliss v. Brainard, 41 N.H. 256; Lewis v. Welch, 14 N.H. 294; Roby v. West, 4 N.H. 285. Adulterated milk could not legally be sold. Laws 1917, c. 156, s. 1. *Page 560

At least two cans of the milk sold by the plaintiff to the defendants, i.e. those from which the samples were taken, were watered. For the price of these two cans, amounting to one dollar, there can be no recovery. A verdict for the plaintiff for the balance of his claim would be sustainable upon the reported facts.

Case discharged.

Case Details

Case Name: Moskwa v. Nassikas
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: May 4, 1926
Citation: 133 A. 321
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.