History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carey v. Dunsmore
58 N.H. 357
| N.H. | 1878
|
Check Treatment

Under the instructions the jury must have found that the plaintiff was induced, in consequence of the declarations, acts, and conduct of the defendant, to change her position; that she took the note, because he represented that it was a valid note, which he was liable to pay. These facts being proved, the doctrine of equitable estoppel, as recognized in Drew v. Kimball, 43 N.H. 282, and Horn v. Cole, 51 N.H. 287, applies. The instructions were correct.

Judgment on the verdict.

ALLEN and CLARK JJ., did not sit. *Page 358

Case Details

Case Name: Carey v. Dunsmore
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1878
Citation: 58 N.H. 357
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.