History
  • No items yet
midpage
Woodbury v. Whiting
44 A. 385
| N.H. | 1895
|
Check Treatment

The jury could not have found for the defendant if they had not found that the defendant did not speak the words alleged. Wier v. Allen,51 N.H. 177, 180. If the defendant did not make the charge alleged as the slander, it is of no consequence whether the evidence excepted to was or was not competent upon the question of damages. The case presents no reason for the consideration of that question. Wier v. Allen, supra.

Exception overruled.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Woodbury v. Whiting
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1895
Citation: 44 A. 385
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.