History
  • No items yet
midpage
Belknap v. Clark
58 N.H. 150
| N.H. | 1877
|
Check Treatment

Belknap county is a body corporate, for the purpose of sueing and being sued. Gen. St., c. 22, s. 1. The plaintiff should have been described as the county of Belknap, and the amendment was properly allowed. Lebanon v. Griffin, 45 N.H. 558, 563; Flanders v. Stewartstown, 47 N.H. 549.

There was no error of law in the order of the court for an additional specification. Benedict v. Swain, 43 N.H. 33; Saunders v. Osgood,46 N.H. 21.

Assumpsit lies. Wentworth v. Gove, 45 N.H. 160.

Case discharged.

FOSTER J., did not sit.

Case Details

Case Name: Belknap v. Clark
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Aug 5, 1877
Citation: 58 N.H. 150
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.