History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co.
35 A. 1129
| N.H. | 1894
|
Check Treatment

ASSUMPSIT, for eighty-four tons of iron rails. The court ordered a verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiffs excepted. It appearing that one C. bargained with the plaintiffs for the iron, that he was not the defendants' agent and had no authority from them to make the purchase, and there being no other evidence tending to show that the defendants contracted for the iron, the exceptions were overruled.

SMITH, J., did not sit.

Case Details

Case Name: Boston & Maine Railroad v. Union Street Railway Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1894
Citation: 35 A. 1129
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.