History
  • No items yet
midpage
Folsom v. Blood
58 N.H. 11
| N.H. | 1876
|
Check Treatment

The attestation of the judgment by the clerk of the common pleas is not indispensable. Willard v. Harvey, 24 N.H. 344; Hall v. Manchester,40 N.H. 410; Sumner v. Sebec, 3 Me. 223. *Page 12 If it were prescribed by statute, the statute would be directory, and other evidence of the authenticity of the record would be received. Secombe v. Steele, 20 How. 94, 102. The clerk of the superior court, having the custody of the records of the common pleas, is the proper officer to furnish copies of those records, and his certificate is evidence of what there are. Carlisle v. Thompson, 5 N.H. 411; Mahurin v. Bickford,6 N.H. 567, 570, 571; Hall v. Manchester, supra; 1 Greenl. Ev., s. 506.

Motion denied.

ALLEN, J., did not sit.

Case Details

Case Name: Folsom v. Blood
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1876
Citation: 58 N.H. 11
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.